<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ANSIRH blog &#187; Carole Joffe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ansirh.org/author/carole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ansirh.org</link>
	<description>News and views on reproductive health research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>African Americans and abortion: An intriguing poll</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2013/02/african-americans-and-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2013/02/african-americans-and-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unintended pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's experiences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=2615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans appears to be in a period of heightened support for abortion, as revealed in a number of recent national polls. In contrast to earlier polls, which typically showed the country split nearly 50-50 on the abortion question, exit polling on election day 2012 showed a considerably more lopsided degree of support for legal abortion, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2013/02/african-americans-and-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on the 2012 election and abortion</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2012/11/2012-election-and-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2012/11/2012-election-and-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy & regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrictions on abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state restrictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=2351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The abortion rights community is immensely relieved at the results of the recent election. President Obama&#8217;s victory means, first and foremost, that the Supreme Court at the very least will retain its present ideological spread for the foreseeable future. The vacancy nominations that Obama will put forward will undoubtedly be individuals who will uphold Roe v [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2012/11/2012-election-and-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passionate engagement: Two doctors speak about their abortion activism</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2012/04/doctors-and-abortion-activism/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2012/04/doctors-and-abortion-activism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy & regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrictions on abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=1940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I thought I might get in over my head and I might have done so! But I&#8217;m glad I did it anyway and in the process got connected to some folks I might not have met otherwise, it is definitely worth doing.” Speaking is Dr. Pippa Abston, a pediatrician in Alabama, recounting for a journalist [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2012/04/doctors-and-abortion-activism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why lies about reproductive health issues matter</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/09/lies-about-reproductive-health-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/09/lies-about-reproductive-health-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ANSIRH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media misinformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=1645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Non-factually based statements” about Planned Parenthood and the HPV vaccine: “If you want an abortion, you go to Planned Parenthood, and that&#8217;s well over 90 percent of what Planned Parenthood does.&#8221; “I had a mother come up to me last night here in Tampa, Fla., after the debate. She told me that her little daughter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/09/lies-about-reproductive-health-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s at stake in the IOM Report?</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/07/iom-report/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/07/iom-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy & regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unintended pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=1614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently announced recommendations regarding mandatory insurance coverage with no co-pays for women&#8217;s preventative health care services under the new health care law. Predictably, a firestorm has ensued. This is because one of the eight services recommended is coverage of all FDA-approved contraceptive methods. Professional medical organizations and health advocacy group [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/07/iom-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Planet: Abortion in Norway</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/06/abortion-in-norway/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/06/abortion-in-norway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy & regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion at hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrictions on abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence against abortion providers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=1385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was the “of course” in Dr. Anja Hauge&#8217;s (not her real name) e-mail to me that was my first hint that when it comes to abortion, Norway and the United States exist in two different universes. On a recent visit, I had asked a Norwegian colleague to arrange an interview for me with a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/06/abortion-in-norway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unconscionable cruelty: Nebraska&#8217;s 20 week law meets the real world</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/03/nebraska-20-week-abortion-law/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/03/nebraska-20-week-abortion-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy & regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[later abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrictions on abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state restrictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=1127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Nebraska&#8217;s new abortion law forced Danielle Deaver to live through ten excruciating days, waiting to give birth to a baby that she and her doctors knew would die minutes later, fighting for breath that would not come. And that&#8217;s what happened. [After the baby girl was born]… Deaver and her husband Robb watched, held and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/03/nebraska-20-week-abortion-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does insurance coverage of abortion matter?</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/02/insurance-and-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/02/insurance-and-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[policy & regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Tiller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue of insurance coverage for abortion almost derailed the passage of health care reform last year. While prochoice Democrats insisted that the abortion measure they supported was “abortion neutral”—that is, neither increasing or decreasing the currently extremely limited use of federal funds to pay for abortion. which is restricted to cases of rape, incest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/02/insurance-and-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Philadelphia abortion clinic disaster: Is more regulation the answer?</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/02/abortion-clinics-and-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/02/abortion-clinics-and-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy & regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state restrictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On one thing, both sides of the abortion divide agree: the now-closed Philadelphia clinic of Dr. Kermit Gosnell, Women&#8217;s Medical Society, was a true “chamber of horror,” as a Grand Jury report stated. The report details unspeakably filthy conditions, unlicensed and unqualified personnel performing complex medical procedures involving anesthesia, a doctor who repeatedly flouted both [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/02/abortion-clinics-and-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is mifepristone finally realizing its promise? Comments on the most recent Guttmacher data</title>
		<link>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/01/mifepristone-and-abortion-access/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/01/mifepristone-and-abortion-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole Joffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy & regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion at hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medication abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence against abortion providers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ansirh.org/?p=793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The periodic exhaustive survey of  abortion incidence and access to services in the United States by researchers at the Guttmacher Institute is extremely helpful to qualitative social scientists, such as myself, who study the abortion issue. The most recent version of the survey, drawing on 2008 data, received most attention for its conclusions that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ansirh.org/2011/01/mifepristone-and-abortion-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
